Welcome to Science Court!

Photo of the 2018 Science Court trial showing a student attorney from the con team questioning a witness in front of judge, jury, instructors and audience

Welcome to Science Court!

Science Court is a project designed to combat polarization in American society and strengthen democracy. It is run as an interdisciplinary course in the University of Minnesota Honors Program involving students from across the university. The students select a controversial issue and spend an entire semester studying it in depth to determine the facts (based on sound scientific research) and then argue it in a mock trial in front of a jury of citizens with a mix of views and backgrounds. The public is engaged through compelling audio, video and online content generated by the students about the preparations, trial and verdict. The trial is free and open to the public.

Logo of the College of Science and Engineering at the University of Minnesota

Watch talk by Prof. Ellad Tadmor on Science Court given as part of the College of Science and Engineering (CSE) Curiosity Drives Progress Lecture Series

 

Logo of MPR News with Kerri Miller show

Listen to an interview with Kerri Miller on MPR News discussing Science Court with Prof. Ellad Tadmor and student Like Diamond.

Picture of a large hall full of desks with students taking a test

The 2022 Science Court case is

Grading practices at the University of Minnesota can lead to bias, stress, and disincentivize learning, new innovative student assessment methods should be adopted

This year's Science Court is in partnership with the University of Minnesota (UMN) Student Senate. This topic is inspired by a Student Senate resolution, approved on December 3, 2020, requesting an extension of the UMN policy allowing students to opt for S/N grading (Satisfactory/Not satisfactory) in any course due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Science Court case generalizes this to a full reevaluation of how students are assessed at UMN. This is timely considering increasing concerns regarding student mental health, the increased emphasis on student diversity and equity, changes in how students learn due to the technological environment, the increase in scholastic dishonesty facilitated by the internet and social media, and the rise of remote learning.
 
Science Court will consider student assessment holistically exploring what is known from scientific research in domains of knowledge informing this topic and propose two main strategies, Refine versus Reform, for the Student Senate to consider.

  • The "Reform" (pro) approach proposes to replace the current UMN system with alternative methods for grading and student assessment proposed in the literature and tested at other institutions.
  • The “Refine” (con) approach will argue to largely retain the current UMN grading system with modifications aimed at addressing its limitations based on research findings.

Stay tuned or follow us on twitter or join the Science Court mailing list to be kept informed.

Fill in the following poll and tell us what you think about the case.

LATEST BLOG POSTS

WATCH VIDEO: A LOOK BACK AT THE FIRST SCIENCE COURT CLASS!

Watch this short documentary about the first-ever Science Court course at the University of Minnesota.  It’s a behind-the-scenes look at the class from the first day through  the verdict!  The video was written and narrated by our podcaster, Luke Diamond, and edited by our media team member Porter Larkin.     

We would love to read your comments - you can post below. 

And that officially ends our blog posts for this semester,  written by yours truly, media team member Jill Peterson. 

Thank you everyone for following along!  See you next year. 

THE VERDICT IS IN, AND….

The suspense is over!  The majority of the jury voted against the 1:1 technology program. The jury foreman offered his thoughts about the process and how they came to their decision : 10 voted against (CON) for 1:1 technology in Minneapolis public schools, and 3 voted (PRO).  

Foreman Reading Verdict

Jury gifts
After the announcement, the jury were given certificates of appreciation and a special pen from the University of Minnesota Department of Aerospace, Engineering and Mechanics, which is the department where Professor Tadmor’s department usually teaches when he’s not running a brand new honors courses like this one.